This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour

Kevin Ferrell, et al. v. Buckingham Property Management

Published: Aug. 5, 2022 | Result Date: Jan. 25, 2022 | Filing Date: Aug. 8, 2014 |

Case number: 1:19-cv-00332-JLT-SAB Settlement –  $600,000

Judge

Jennifer L. Thurston

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Edwin Aiwazian
(Lawyers for Justice PC)


Defendant

John T. Egley
(Call & Jensen APC)


Facts

Buckingham Property Management specializes in management of residential real estate. Kevin Ferrell was employed by Buckingham Property Management as a non-exempt maintenance technician. Cheryl Baker was employed as a non-exempt community manager. Ferrell and Baker brought a class action and pursued a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) representative action against Buckingham Property Management. The class consisted of all current and former California-based non-exempt individuals employed by Buckingham as "property employees" during the relevant period. "Property employees" were defined as non-exempt employees with the following job positions: area relief manager; assistant community manager; community manager; contact assistant manager; grounds keeper; janitor; maintenance technician, porter residential service coordinator; and security.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that defendant violated the California Labor Code and the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to properly pay minimum and overtime wages; failing to provide compliant meal and rest periods or pay associated premiums; failing to timely pay wages upon termination; failing to provide compliant wage statements; failing to maintain requisite payroll records; and failing to reimburse necessary business-related expenses. Plaintiffs contended that defendant's conduct constituted unfair business practices under the California Business and Professions Code and gave rise to penalties under PAGA.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all contentions, and further denied that plaintiffs were entitled to any relief.

Settlement Discussions

The parties engaged in a private mediation with Paul Grossman, a mediator experienced in handling complex wage-and-hour matters, and reached a settlement with the aid of the mediator's evaluations and proposal. The parties engaged in additional negotiations regarding settlement, and ultimately reached a settlement to address the points of concern raised by the Fresno County Superior Court.

Result

The case settled for $600,000.


#139179

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390