This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
ERISA
Termination of Long-Term Disability Benefits

Cassandra Hall v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3

Published: Aug. 12, 2022 | Result Date: Jun. 23, 2022 | Filing Date: Oct. 9, 2020 |

Case number: 20-cv-07076-JD Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

James Donato

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

James P. Keenley
(Bolt Keenley Kim LLP)


Defendant

Alison L. Macneill
(Campbell Litigation PC)

Katherine P. Gardiner
(WFBM LLP)

Stacey A. Campbell
(Campbell Litigation PC)


Facts

Cassandra Hall worked as a testing technician for AT&T and was diagnosed with "an impingement and acromioclavicular arthropathy with labral tear" in her right shoulder during her employment. Her range of motion improved significantly after two corrective surgeries in May 2017 and March 2018, as well as two rounds of physical therapy. In July 2018, Hall reported to Dr. Renbaum, who opined that she was not capable of performing her regular work activities.
As part of her employment, Hall had signed up for an AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 on January 1, 2018. The plan delegated administrative authority to the plan administrator, AT&T Services, Inc., who delegated that authority to Sedgewick, a third-party claims administrator. An employee was considered disabled for purpose of the benefits when they had a sickness, injury or other medical, psychiatric or psychological condition that prevents them from engaging in any occupation or employment for which they are qualified or may reasonably become qualified. AT&T approved short-term disability benefits for Hall and then approved long-term benefits beginning June 4, 2017, after the short-term benefits expired. However, AT&T denied further payments on May 1, 2019, based on a review of Hall's medical records by Dr. Heck, a physician hired by AT&T. Hall appealed the denial. The reviewing doctor, Dr. Swamy, also found that Hall was not disabled.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff alleged that defendant had accepted and paid a claim for long-term disability benefits for two years and then terminated the benefits based on an improper paper review of her medical files. In particular, plaintiff alleged that defendant unduly slighted the reports of Hall's treating physicians, Dr. Renbaum and Dr. Roth, and excessively relied on the records of the physicians advisors defendant retained, Dr. Swamy and Dr. Heck.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all contentions.

Result

Summary judgment was granted in favor of defendant.


#139257

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390