This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act

Alex Escobar, individually and on behalf of a class of other similarly situated individuals v. Major League Baseball, and Los Angeles Dodgers LLC

Published: Aug. 19, 2022 | Result Date: Apr. 19, 2022 | Filing Date: Oct. 26, 2018 |

Case number: 18STCV02491 Settlement –  $850,000

Judge

Carolyn B. Kuhl

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John R. Habashy
(Lexicon Law PC)

Tiffany N. Buda
(Lexicon Law PC)

Scott D. Owens
(Scott D. Owens P.A.)


Defendant

Thomas E. Gorman
(Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP)

R. Adam Lauridsen
(Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP)


Facts

Alex Escobar brought a putative class action against Major League Baseball and Los Angeles Dodgers, LLC. The class members included all persons who, during the relevant period, engaged in one or more transactions using a personal debit card or credit card at one or more of the ticket-selling locations at Dodger Stadium, and was provided an electronically printed receipt displaying more than the last five digits of the card number or the expiration date. Approximately 56,000 transactions were electronically printed at ticket-selling locations at Dodger Stadium within the two years prior to the filing of the complaint.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendants willfully issued in point-of-sale credit and debit card transactions that disclosed the expiration date of credit and debit cards in violation of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA). Plaintiff further alleged that this disclosure harmed him by, among other things, violating his statutory rights under FACTA, invading his privacy rights, subjecting him to an increased risk of identity theft, and imposing upon him the burden of safeguarding or destroying receipts to prevent further disclosure.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all contentions and denied any wrongdoing whatsoever.

Settlement Discussions

The parties attended an in-person mediation conference conducted by the Honorable Jay C. Gandhi (Ret.) and engaged in substantial arms-length negotiations to resolve the litigation.

Result

The case settled for $850,000.


#139292

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390