This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement

Trinity Info Media LLC v. Covalent Inc.

Published: Aug. 26, 2022 | Result Date: Nov. 23, 2021 | Filing Date: Feb. 15, 2021 |

Case number: 2:21-cv-01360-JWH-MRW Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Judge

John W. Holcomb

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gregory Hillyer
(Hillyer Legal)

Ashley D. Posner
(Posner Law Corporation)


Defendant

Thomas E. Dietrich
(The McArthur Law Firm PC)

Stephen C. McArthur
(The McArthur Law Firm PC)


Facts

Trinity Info Media, LLC (Trinity) was the assignee of two patents, both entitled "Poll-based Networking System." In essence, the patents described a system that records a profile from information provided by a user and their responses to questions to match the user with people, goods, products, and services based on similar profiles. Trinity filed a patent infringement suit against Covalent, Inc. for activities it alleged violated its patents.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant had engaged in activities that infringed upon its patents for a poll-based networking system. Specifically, plaintiff contended that defendant had used a data processing system to receive user information to generate a unique profile, provide the user with polling questions, receive and store responses, and compare the selected answers to other users' responses to match similar users together.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that it had not infringed plaintiff's patents; and that plaintiff's patents were invalid for claiming patent-ineligible subject matter. More specifically, defendant contended that plaintiff's patents claimed abstract ideas, which are ineligible for patent protection, by claiming the idea of matching users who gave corresponding answers to a question, and then trying to patent that idea by computerizing that abstract idea.

Result

The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss.

Other Information

Plaintiff's appeal is currently pending.


#139316

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390