This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Trademark Infringement

Yogurtland Franchising Inc. v. Ramanjit Brar

Published: Sep. 16, 2022 | Result Date: Jul. 21, 2022 | Filing Date: Mar. 29, 2022 |

Case number: 8:22-cv-00508-SB-PLA Bench Decision –  $500,000

Judge

Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David J. Root
(Bryan, Cave, Leighton & Paisner LLP)

Keith D. Klein
(Bryan, Cave, Leighton & Paisner LLP)


Defendant

Bobby Samini
(The Samini Firm APC)

John S. Oney IV
(The Samini Firm APC)


Facts

Yogurtland Franchising Inc. owns the Yogurtland Marks: trademarks, tradenames, service marks, derivations and logos. As part of the franchise, Yogurtland Franchising licensed the right to use the Yogurtland Marks to franchisees for use as part of their businesses. On January 17, 2014, Ramanjit Brar entered into a franchise agreement with Yogurtland Franchising. Six years later, after Brar failed to pay outstanding royalty and marketing fees, Yogurtland Franchising notified Brar that he was in breach of the Franchise Agreement. Notices were again sent the following year twice and the Franchise Agreement was terminated thereafter. However, Brar refused to comply with the post-termination obligations outlined in the Franchise Agreement, for example, failing to remove the Yogurtland trademarks and service marks from the store. On March 29, 2022, Yogurtland Franchising filed suit against Brar.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant materially breached the Franchise Agreement and consequently, it suffered loss, damage and injury, including but not limited to, unpaid royalties and marketing fees, and a loss of future revenue from the recurring fees over what was left of the Franchise Agreement's terms. Plaintiff asserted several claims including federal trademark infringement and false designation of origin, common law trademark infringement and common law unfair competition, unfair competition in violation of California Business and Professions Code Section 17200 and breach of contract.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all contentions.

Result

The parties agreed to settle. Among other confidential settlement terms, Brar agreed to pay Yogurtland Franchising $500,000 as damages, with a discount for timely payments. Also, Brar was permanently enjoined from several actions such as reproducing, counterfeiting, copying the Yogurtland Marks to identify goods or services not authorized by Yogurtland Franchising.


#139439

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390