This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

Pacwest Bankcorp v. David I. Rainer

Published: Oct. 7, 2022 | Result Date: Sep. 1, 2022 | Filing Date: Dec. 1, 2020 |

Case number: 20STCV46002 Settlement –  $6,500,000

Judge

Gail Killefer

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David P. Crochetiere
(Baute, Crochetiere, Hartley & Velkei LLP)

Mark D. Baute
(Baute, Crochetiere, Hartley & Velkei LLP)

Bryan D. Roth
(Baute, Crochetiere, Hartley & Velkei LLP)


Defendant

Bert H. Deixler
(Kendall Brill & Kelly LLP)

Nary Kim
(Kendall Brill & Kelly LLP)

Brent L. Caslin
(Jenner & Block LLP)

Madeline P. Skitzki
(Jenner & Block LLP)

Alexander M. Smith
(Jenner & Block LLP)

Elizabeth Avunjian
(Jenner & Block LLP)


Facts

On May 25, 2017, David I. Rainer entered into a consulting agreement with PacWest for a yearly fee of $550,000. Rainer was hired as the Executive Chairman of Bank of Southern California on November 5, 2020. On December 1, 2020, PacWest filed a complaint for unfair competition, breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On December 23, 2020, Rainer filed a cross-complaint against PacWest for breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unfair competition.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that it entered into a consulting agreement with defendant Rainer that contained a valid non-compete clause and obligations to assist Plaintiff's business development but that defendant Rainer took a position at a competing banking institution, defendant Bank of Southern California, while still bound by the terms of their agreement and embarked on a plan at Bank of Southern California to illegally solicit Plaintiff's employees and customers.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all contentions, including because the non-compete clause was no longer in effect or enforceable at the time he took a new position.

Result

Defendant Bank of Southern California paid $6,500,000 in settlement of all claims.


#139625

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390