This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Period

Felix Aguilar, Jose Martinez and Jose Cazares, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. All Seaons Roofing & Waterproofing Inc., Vladislav N. Gorshteyn, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Published: Oct. 21, 2022 | Result Date: Apr. 14, 2022 | Filing Date: Mar. 2, 2020 |

Case number: 20CV364524 Settlement –  $995,000

Judge

Sunil R. Kulkarni

Court

Santa Clara County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Maria Cristina Molteni
(Molteni Employment Law)


Defendant

Jonathan Fraser Light
(LightGabler)

Jamie N. Stein
(LightGabler)

Jaclyn M. Joyce
(Light Gabler)


Facts

Felix Aguilar, Jose Martinez, and Jose Cazares are all individuals who reside in California, and they were all employed as non-exempt, skilled roofers by All Seasons Roofing & Waterproofing between 2009 and January 2020. All Seasons Roofing & Waterproofing, Inc. is a California corporation with its principal place of business in San Jose, California, that is engaged in business as a general building and roofing contractor. On March 2, 2020, Aguilar, Martinez, and Cazares filed a lawsuit against All Seasons Roofing and its owner, Vladislav N. Gorshteyn, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that the defendants failed to pay the proper minimum prevailing wage rate for hours worked on public works jobs; failed to pay employees for all hours worked as required by law; failed to pay overtime and double time as required; failed to provide meal and rest breaks as required by law; failed to pay earned wages upon discharge; failed to provide accurate wage statements; and engaged in unlawful business practices and unfair competitive practices. Specifically, the plaintiffs contended that the defendants failed to pay them for compensable time spent waiting and traveling; would not pay overtime even though employees regularly worked more than eight hours per day, instead "banking" that time to be compensated later; and that the defendants combined both rest periods with the meal break period into one 50-minute break.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied any wrongdoing and all liability and all of the plaintiffs' material allegations.

Result

The parties reached an agreement wherein the defendants admitted no liability but agreed to pay $995,000 to settle class members' claims.


#139656

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390