This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
National Origin Discrimination
Gender Discrimination

Koreda Tan v. City and County of San Francisco, Treasurer & Tax Collector, Jose Cisneros, as Treasurer for Treasurer & Tax Collector, David P. Augustine, as Tax Collector for City and County of San Francisco and Does 1 through 20

Published: Oct. 21, 2022 | Result Date: Sep. 13, 2022 | Filing Date: Dec. 3, 2019 |

Case number: CGC-19-581229 Settlement –  $180,000

Judge

Samuel K. Feng

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Tanya R. Meyers
(Law Offices of Tanya R. Meyers)


Defendant

Kate G. Kimberlin
(Office of the San Francisco City Attorney)


Facts

In March 2008, Koreda Tan, who is of Loatian and Chinese descent, was hired by the City and County of San Francisco in the Tax Collector's office. From December 29, 2016 to March 8, 2017, Tan was on CFRA/FMLA leave. She returned to work on March 9, 2017, after having been granted a modified work schedule. On December 3, 2019, Tan filed a lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court for employment discrimination based on gender, national origin, race, age, hostile work environment, failure to investigate, train and remedy, retaliation and also a tort claim for intrusion into private affairs.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that as early as October 2016, she began to be subjected to escalating adverse treatment for engaging in protected activities such as complaining of discrimination, requesting and using disability-related accommodation, making a worker's compensation request, and complaining about management's refusal to timely process the worker's comp request. She also faced harassment and a hostile work environment when she complained about these issues. Consequently she filed two complaints internally and also with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all contentions. For example, they alleged that certain policies, practices or actions plaintiff complained of were done pursuant to seniority or merit system that was in accordance with terms set forth between plaintiff's union and defendant. Moreover, actions taken by defendants were based on legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons.

Result

The case settled for $180,000.


#139660

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390