This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Overtime Compensation

Anthony Barahona, an individual, for himself and those similarly situated v. Rabobank, N.A., Mechanics Bank, N.A., and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

Published: Oct. 14, 2022 | Result Date: Jun. 4, 2021 | Filing Date: Oct. 15, 2019 |

Case number: 56-2019-00534788-CU-OE-VTA Settlement –  $250,000

Judge

Paul W. Feldman

Court

Ventura County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael Strauss

Aris E. Karakalos
(Karakalos Law APC)


Defendant

Charles L. Post
(Weintraub, Tobin, Chediak, Coleman & Grodin Law Corp.)

Meagan D. Bainbridge
(Weintraub Tobin)


Facts

Anthony Barahona worked as a Banking Representative for Rabobank, a national banking association, headquartered in Roseville, California. On August 31, 2019, Rabobank was acquired by Mechanics Bank. After being let go, Barahona filed a class action suit against Rabobank and Mechanics.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF’S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant failed to pay overtime wages, failed to provide accurate pay stubs, failed to pay wages due upon termination and engaged in unfair competition. He worked as an hourly employee and was denied overtime compensation because defendant failed to include non-discretionary bonuses, commissions, incentives and other non-discretionary consideration into the calculation of his overtime and double-time rates. For example, he would receive such bonuses when he would open a new credit card account for customers, or when he achieved certain pre-set metrics relating to his performance. Consequently, his pay stubs were also inaccurate and he was not paid correct overtime wages as these bonuses were not included into his base rate to calculate his overtime.

DEFENDANTS’ CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all claims, contentions, charges of wrongdoing or liability. They maintained they complied in good faith with applicable laws and dealt fairly and legally with plaintiff and the class members.

Settlement Discussions

The parties agreed to mediation and on June 29, 2020, attended a session with Tripper Ortman. The mediator remained engaged in facilitating ongoing settlement discussions and approximately a week later the parties agreed to settle.

Result

The case settled with defendant agreeing to pay a gross settlement amount of $250,000.


#139708

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390