This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Violation of Proposition 65

Center for Environmental Health v. Princess Polly USA Inc., and Does 1 through 200, inclusive

Published: Dec. 9, 2022 | Result Date: Sep. 2, 2022 | Filing Date: Apr. 25, 2022 |

Case number: 22-CV-010343 Settlement –  $45,000

Judge

Frank Roesch

Court

Alameda County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Howard J. Hirsch
(Lexington Law Group LLP)

Joseph J. Mann
(Lexington Law Group)


Defendant

Steven E. Soule
(Kirkland & Ellis LLP)


Facts

Lead, a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects and other reproductive harm, is subject to the clear and reasonable warning requirement regarding reproductive toxicants under Proposition 65.

Center for Environmental Health, in the public interest, brought an action against Princess Polly USA, Inc.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant's belts, made with leather, vinyl, or imitation leather materials, as well as the metallic components of the belt buckles, were contaminated with significant quantities of lead. Plaintiff asserted that defendant introduced the contaminated products into the California marketplace, thereby exposing users of their products, many of whom were pregnant women and children, to lead. Despite the fact that defendant exposed pregnant women, children, and other people who came into contact with the products to lead, defendant provided no warnings whatsoever about these lead exposures. Defendant's conduct thus violated the warning provision of Proposition 65.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all contentions.

Result

$45,000 settlement and injunctive relief.


#139876

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390