This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
Securities Exchange Act
Misrepresentation

Michael Sanders, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. The Realreal Inc., Julie Wainwright, Matt Gustke, Steve Lo, Chip Baird, Maha Ibrahim, Rob Krolik, Michael Kumin, Stefan Larsson, Niki Leondakis, James Miller, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, BOFA Securities Inc., UBS Securities LLC, Keybanc Capital Markets Inc., Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Cowen and Company LLC, Raymond James & Associates Inc.

Published: Dec. 23, 2022 | Result Date: Jul. 28, 2022 | Filing Date: Nov. 25, 2019 |

Case number: 5:19-cv-07737-EJD Settlement –  $11,000,000

Judge

Edward J. Davila

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Laurence M. Rosen
(The Rosen Law Firm PA)

Joshua Baker
(The Rosen Law Firm PA)

Phillip Kim
(The Rosen Law Firm PA)


Defendant

Lisa R. Bugni
(King & Spalding LLP)

Peter M. Stone
(Paul Hastings LLP)


Facts

Michael Sanders, Nubia Lorelle, and Garth Wakeford brought a class action against The RealReal Inc. (TRR), an online marketplace for authenticated, consigned luxury goods; and TRR's directors, executive officers, and major shareholders, including Julie Wainwright; Matt Gutske; Steve Lo; Chip Baird; Maha Ibrahim; Rob Krolik; Michael Kumin; Stefan Larsson; Niki Leondakis; and James Miller. Also named as defendants were Credit Suisse Securities LLC; BofA Securities Inc.; UBS Securities LLC.; KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc.; Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Cowen and Company LLC; and Raymond James & Associates, Inc.

The class included all persons and entities who purchased TRR common stock during the relevant period and were damaged thereby.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs asserted claims under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. Plaintiffs contended that TRR's authentication process fell far short of its description. Only a small proportion of the thousands of items processed by the company each day actually went to its small group of expert authenticators--specifically only certain brands and items deemed to face a particularly high risk of counterfeiting. Plaintiffs asserted that the vast majority of items supposedly authenticated by the company were actually reviewed only by the company's copywriters, who often had little or no experience in fashion or luxury products and were given approximately 2-4 minutes authenticating any given item to meet quotas that were strictly enforced. Plaintiffs argued that as the inevitable result of this highly-pressurized authentication process, hundreds of counterfeit items were processed and sold to TRR customers. The truth about TRR's authentication process began to leak out. As a result, TRR's stock price declined significantly, damaging investors.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all contentions.

Settlement Discussions

The parties participated in mediation before the Honorable Layn R. Phillips (Ret.) and ultimately accepted a mediator's proposal to resolve the action.

Result

The parties reached a settlement agreement wherein the defendants admitted no wrongdoing but agreed to pay $11 million to settle class members' claims.


#139963

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390