This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Period

Shontiara Hubbard, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated and on behalf of other aggrieved employees pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act v. Title 9 Sports Inc., Title Nine, and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

Published: Dec. 30, 2022 | Result Date: Aug. 16, 2022 | Filing Date: Jan. 2, 2020 |

Case number: RG20048976 Settlement –  $515,000

Judge

Winifred Y. Smith

Court

Alameda County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Anthony J. Orshansky
(CounselOne PC)

Jennifer L. Connor
(CounselOne PC)

Edwin Aiwazian
(Lawyers for Justice PC)

Arby Aiwazian
(Lawyers for Justice PC)

Tara Zabehi
(Lawyers for Justice PC)


Defendant

Robert A. Cutbirth
(Slovak, Baron, Empey, Murphy & Pinkey LLP)


Facts

On January 2, 2020, Shontiara Hubbard, individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated and other aggrieved employees, filed a class action lawsuit against Title 9 Sports, Inc, alleging various California Labor Code and California Business & Professions Code violations. The class included all current and former hourly-paid or non-exempt employees who worked for Title 9 Sports, Inc. at its distribution center facility in California from February 2, 2016, to December 4, 2021.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff alleged that defendant failed to: pay overtime; provide timely and compliant meal periods and pay premiums owed thereon; provide timely and compliant rest breaks and pay premiums owed thereon; pay minimum wages; pay all wages upon termination; pay all wages owed timely during employment; provide accurate itemized wage statements; keep requisite payroll records; and reimburse necessary business expenses for its non-exempt California employees in violation of the Labor Code and IWC Wage Orders. Plaintiff contended that as a result of these labor violations, defendant engaged in unfair and unlawful business competition in violation of the Business & Professions Code.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all contentions.

Result

Defendant agreed to pay $515,000 to settle all claims.


#139985

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390