This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Period

Kenneth Toste, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and aggrieved v. Path Ventures, a California corporation, doing business as "People Assisting The Homeless"; and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

Published: Jan. 13, 2023 | Result Date: Sep. 28, 2022 | Filing Date: Dec. 23, 2019 |

Case number: 19STCV45845 Settlement –  $625,000

Judge

Stuart M. Rice

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David D. Bibiyan
(Bibiyan Law Group PC)

Jasmin K. Gill
(J. Gill Law Group PC)

Todd M. Friedman
(Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman PC)


Defendant

Steven C. Amundson
(Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez, Trester LLP)

Alina Sookasian
(Slater Slater Schulman LLP)


Facts

Kenneth Toste, Cesilia Mixco, and Joia Williams were employed by PATH, doing business as People Assisting the Homeless, as a non-exempt, hourly employees. On November 20, 2019, Toste filed a notice under Labor Code Section 2699.3 with the Labor and Workforce Development Agency that he intended to file a Private Attorneys General Act lawsuit against PATH. He also served the notice on PATH. Mixco and Williams filed a separate notice with LWDA on January 23, 2020, declaring their intent to seek civil penalties on behalf of California for aggrieved employees.

On December 23, 2019, Toste filed suit against PATH on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated. Mixco and Williams filed a putative class action on January 23, 2020, and the actions were subsequently consolidated.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that the defendants failed to pay minimum wage and overtime wages as required by law; failed to pay employees for all hours worked; failed to provide adequate meal periods and rest breaks and associated premium payments; failed to issue accurate, itemized wage statements; failed to timely pay all wages due at the time of separation from employment; and engaged in unfair competitive practices.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied any liability or wrongdoing and all of the plaintiffs' material allegations.

Result

The parties reached a settlement agreement wherein the defendants admitted no wrongdoing or liability but agreed to pay $625,000 to settle class members' and PAGA claims.


#140032

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390