Glenda Mendoza v. County of Orange
Published: Dec. 23, 2022 | Result Date: Oct. 31, 2022 | Filing Date: Apr. 12, 2019 |Case number: 30-2019-01063389-CU-OE-NJC Verdict – $1,237,854
Judge
Court
Orange County Superior Court
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Jason M. Erlich
(Erlich Law Firm, P.C.)
Bijan Darvish
(Law Office of Bijan Darvish APC)
Defendant
Shannon L. Gustafson
(Lynberg & Watkins)
Norman J. Watkins
(Lynberg & Watkins )
Facts
A supervisor in the Orange County Public Defender's office sent a sexually explicit text/GIF to his female subordinate, plaintiff Glenda Mendoza. He waited 10 minutes for a response and then called telling her it was meant for a friend and to delete it (He later claimed during the investigation and at trial that it was meant for his wife). The following months, the supervisor began to intimidate Mendoza with comments like, "you're not capable of doing the job" and "I'm not an asshole, but it doesn't mean I can't be if needed." About three months after receiving the message, Mendoza reports the supervisor to Human Resources.
Instead of hiring a third party to conduct the investigation, the Public Defender's office conducted the investigation themselves. At one point, County EEO office said the "investigation would be closed, but not considered thorough" and "this is the first time an agency went against the direction of the EEO office." The top County Human Resources employees called a meeting with former Public Defender Sharon Petrosino in November 2018. Two days later, Petrosino sent out an email stating that Mendoza was "not a trustworthy reporter," to make careful note of what she says, and to have witnesseswhile talking to her. Petrosino sent the email to all of Mendoza's supervisors and cc'd Mendoza on the email. Mendoza worked a couple more weeks and then resigned while on her pre-planned vacation.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Mendoza claimed she was constructively terminated. Mendoza presented three claims to the jury: hostile work environment harassment, retaliation and whistleblower retaliation.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all contentions.
Specials in Evidence
Loe: $237,854
Damages
$750,000 past emotional distress, and $250,000 future emotional distress.
Result
Verdict for $1,237,854
Deliberation
two days
Poll
12-0
Length
nine days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390