This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Periods

Jasfer Nepomuceno and Danielle Winkle, individually, and on behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC, and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

Published: Feb. 10, 2023 | Result Date: Aug. 26, 2022 | Filing Date: Feb. 16, 2021 |

Case number: 37- 2021-00006651-CU-OE-CTL Settlement –  $850,000

Judge

Richard S. Whitney

Court

San Diego County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Douglas Han
(Justice Law Corporation)

Shunt Tatavos-Gharajeh
(Justice Law Corporation)

Sang D. Song
(Justice Law Corporation)

Lizette A. Rodriguez
(Justice Law Corporation)


Defendant

Sabrina A. Beldner
(McGuire Woods LLP)


Facts

On February 16, 2021, Jasfer Nepomuceno and Danielle Winkle filed a class action complaint and a separate Private Attorneys General Act representative complaint against Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC., alleging various Labor Code violations. The class included all non-exempt hourly-paid employees who worked for Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC in California from February 16, 2017, through August 26, 2022 and excluding any individuals who filed their own separate action as a named plaintiff alleging the same or similar claims being released. On March 9, 2022, the parties participated in private mediation with David A. Rotman, a well-respected wage and hour mediator.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs alleged that defendant failed to: pay or properly calculate all wages owed including minimum wages, straight time wages, overtime wages, or any other wages; provide proper meal periods or premium pay in lieu thereof; provide complete, accurate or properly formatted wage statements; provide proper rest periods or premium pay in lieu thereof; timely pay wages; maintain payroll records; and reimburse for all necessary business-related costs and expenses for its California employees. Further, plaintiffs contended that as a result of the violations, defendant engaged in unfair business practices in violation of the California Business & Professions Code.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all contentions.

Result

Defendant agreed to pay $850,000 to settle all claims.

Other Information

Consolidated with: 37-2021-00006737-CU-OE-CTL


#140171

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390