This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
Environmental Protection

The People of the State of California v. AT&T Services Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Pacific Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T California, AT&T Corp.

Published: Mar. 3, 2023 | Result Date: Nov. 14, 2022 | Filing Date: Nov. 8, 2022 |

Case number: 22CV02492 Settlement –  $5,900,000

Judge

Timothy R. Volkmann

Court

Santa Cruz County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Karen L. Wold
(Office of the Ventura County District Attorney)


Defendant

Deborah J. Schmall
(Paul Hastings LLP)


Facts

Under state law, businesses that use or transport hazardous materials over certain limits must file a business plan with the California Environmental Reporting System. Plans are required to include the location, type, quantity, and health risks associated with the materials used or transported. As part of its business, AT&T Corporation had emergency generators at numerous sites across the state. Although the generators at the sites used batteries that contained hazardous materials, AT&T never reported them to CERS. When it realized its oversight, AT&T self-reported its violation. A civil case was subsequently filed in Santa Cruz Superior Court by numerous city attorneys and county district attorneys on behalf of the People of the State of California against AT&T and related entities.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that the defendants used batteries containing hazardous materials in emergency generators at over 3000 sites across the state; that state law required the defendants to report their use and transport of these materials; the defendants failed to report as required, and the people were entitled to recover for the defendants' failure.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: The defendants admitted the plaintiff's contentions.

Result

The parties reached an agreement wherein the defendants agreed to pay $5.9 million to settle the plaintiff's claims. The defendants also agreed to implement compliance and auditing measures to ensure future compliance with applicable hazardous materials laws.


#140267

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390