Mark Comin v. International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)
Published: Mar. 1, 2024 | Result Date: Oct. 6, 2022 |Case number: 3:19-cv-07261-JD Settlement – $4,800,000
Judge
Court
USDC Northern District of California
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Kent A. Bronson
(Milberg, Coleman, Bryson, Phillips & Grossman PLLC)
Matthew E. Lee
(Milberg, Coleman, Bryson, Phillips & Grossman PLLC)
Jeremy R. Williams
(Milberg, Coleman, Bryson, Phillips & Grossman PLLC)
Defendant
Aaron L. Agenbroad
(Jones Day)
Cindi L. Ritchey
(Jones Day)
Justin R. Barnes
(Jackson Lewis PC)
Kelli N. Church
(Jackson Lewis PC)
Facts
Mark Comin sued his former employer, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), on behalf of a putative class.
Comin worked for IBM as a sales representative in California for over 17 years before leaving in 2018. IBM paid Comin and other sales reps with a combination of a fixed salary and commissions.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff asserted claims under California Labor Code Section 2751, the Unfair Competition Law, and for breach of contract. Plaintiff contended that defendant had a practice of not providing sales representatives with a written contract about commissions, which Section 251 requires, and failing to pay commissions as they came due. Plaintiff further claimed that defendant had engaged in a "bait and switch" scheme in which it incentivized sales reps with the promise of potentially large commissions under an incentive plan letter (IPL), which outlined sales targets and the rate at which the representative would earn commissions, only to renege and deny that the IPL was an enforceable contract when pay day arrived.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all contentions.
Result
The case settled for $4.75 million.
Other Information
Related Case: 3:21-cv-06645-JD; Briggs v. International Business Machines Corporation
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390