This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
Endangered Species Act
Ports and Waterways Safety Act

Center for Biological Diversity; Friends of the Earth v. NOAA Fisheries, Chris Oliver, in his official capacity as Assistant Administrator of NOAA Fisheries; U.S. Coast Guard; Admiral Karl L. Schultz, in his official capacity as Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard

Published: Mar. 10, 2023 | Result Date: Dec. 7, 2022 | Filing Date: Jan. 14, 2021 |

Case number: 4:21-cv-00345-KAW Summary Judgment –  Plaintiff

Judge

Kandis A. Westmore

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Brian P. Segee
(Center for Biological Diversity)

Catherine W. Kilduff
(Center for Biological Diversity)

Kristen A. Monsell
(Center for Biological Diversity)


Defendant

Frederick H. Turner
(U.S. Department of Justice)


Facts

The humpback whale and other marine life face several threats in the ocean due to factors including pollution, climate change and vessel strikes. Vessel strikes particularly affect migratory whales off the coast of California. On January 14, 2021, the Center for Biological Diversity and Friends of the Earth filed a complaint against the U.S. Coast Guard and National Marine Fisheries Service for declaratory and injunctive relief.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that defendants failed to meet Endangered Species Act consultation requirements which resulted in a flawed biological study that failed to consider the actions that have proven to reduce ship strikes (such as reduced vessel speed limits and route changes to reduce overlap between the whales and shipping traffic), the leading cause of death for blue, fin and humpback whales off California's coast.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that plaintiffs lacked standing, and that the study violated the Endangered Species Act.

Result

Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on their first cause of action for violation of the Endangered Species Act was granted and accordingly, the court did not address the other arguments.


#140389

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390