This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Periods

Thomas Hefner, as an individual on behalf of himself and all similarly situated v. Solaray LLC, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Published: Mar. 17, 2023 | Result Date: Jun. 17, 2022 | Filing Date: Jul. 27, 2021 |

Case number: 21CV384796 Settlement –  $750,000

Judge

Sunil R. Kulkarni

Court

Santa Clara County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Graham S.P. Hollis
(GrahamHollis APC)

Nora Jo Steinhagen
(GrahamHollis APC)


Defendant

Julie A. Vogelzang
(Schor, Vogelzang & Chung LLP)

Lisa H. Chung
(Schor, Vogelzang & Chung LLP)

Carl J. Lehman
(Schor, Vogelzang & Chung LLP)


Facts

Solaray, LLC is a California limited liability company and wholesale retailer of eyewear, accessories, gifts, apparel, and other merchandise. Solaray Sunglasses, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company that does business in California, also selling eyewear, apparel, and other merchandise. Thomas Hefner was a resident of Kern County, California, who was employed by Solaray from June 2020 through January 2021 as a Route Service Representative for the Bakersfield territory, which was an hourly, non-exempt position. Route Service Representatives were responsible for, among other duties, loading and unloading a company vehicle with merchandise, driving a company vehicle to deliver merchandise to customers, communicating with customers, and keeping supervises informed about deliveries. On July 27, 2021, Hefner filed suit against Solaray and Solaray Sunglasses on behalf of himself and all those similarly situated.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that he regularly worked more than 40 hours per week and eight hours in a day; that the defendants failed to provide meal periods as required by law; failed to pay premium wages for missed meal periods; failed to timely pay minimum and regular wages; failed to timely pay all wages due upon separation from employment; failed to furnish accurate itemized wage statements; failed to maintain accurate records; and failed to provide employment and personnel records upon requests. Plaintiff also alleged the defendants were liable for violating the Unfair Competition Law and owed civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied any wrongdoing or liability and all the plaintiff's material allegations.

Result

The parties reached an agreement wherein the defendants admitted no liability or wrongdoing but agreed to pay $750,000 to settle class members' and PAGA claims.


#140413

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390