This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Product Liability
Asbestos Exposure

Janet E. Carpenter et. al. v. 3M Company, et. al.

Published: Mar. 24, 2023 | Result Date: Dec. 6, 2022 | Filing Date: Dec. 31, 2020 |

Case number: 2:20-cv-11797-MWF (MAAx) Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Michael W. Fitzgerald

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Erik P. Karst
(Karst and von Oiste LLP)


Defendant

Paul S. Atigapramoj
(Hugo Parker LLP)

Robert J. Bugatto
(Hugo Parker LLP)

Charles S. Park
(Hugo Parker LLP)

Elizabeth J. Carpenter
(Foley & Mansfield PLLP)

Brett A. Fountain
(Foley & Mansfield PLLP)

Melanie L. Ameele
(Foley & Mansfield PLLP)


Facts

John Carpenter worked as a marine machinist at the Long Beach Naval Shipyard from 1973 until 1984, when he became a mechanical engineering technician. Following Carpenter's death, his wife, Janet E. Carpenter, and children, Brian Carpenter, Michael Carpenter, Teri Carpenter, and Tanya Hardin brought an action against 3M Company, Nibco, Inc., Asco Valve, Inc., and others.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that the decedent contracted and died from mesothelioma due to exposure to asbestos, which occurred during his service in the Navy. Plaintiffs asserted that the decedent worked with or near asbestos-containing products made or sold to the Navy by each defendant. The relevant activities which plaintiffs claimed exposed the decedent to asbestos in connection with Nibco and Asco's products was the removal and replacement of gaskets and/or packing materials that were affixed to Nibco and Asco's valves. Plaintiffs brought claims for negligence, strict liability, false representation, intentional tort/intentional failure to warn, loss of consortium, and punitive damages.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all contentions and argued that plaintiffs failed to adduce sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of triable fact regarding causation.

Result

The court granted summary judgment to defendants Nibco and Asco.


#140421

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390