This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Eminent Domain
Condemnation

County of Los Angeles v. 8400 S. Vermont, L.P., et al.

Published: Feb. 10, 2023 | Result Date: Aug. 26, 2022 |

Case number: BC686141 Verdict –  $39,000,000

Judge

Daniel S. Murphy

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gregory M. Bergman
(BDG Law Group)

Brian J. Bergman
(BDG Law Group)

Jason J. Barbato


Defendant

Charles S. Krolikowski
(Newmeyer & Dillion LLP)

Leah K. McKechnie
(Newmeyer & Dillion LLP)


Facts

In 2017, Plaintiff County of Los Angeles filed an action to take real property (through eminent domain) from Defendant 8400 S. Vermont Avenue, L.P., et al. ("Owner") for a transportation project. The property, located at the corner of Vermont and Manchester in South Los Angeles ("Property"), was vacant at the time of the taking and was approximately 4.2 acres in size. The County initially offered about $15.7 million for the Property. The Owner contended at trial that the County owed $60,145,000 in just compensation for the taking. The County contended at trial that the Property was worth $17,980,000.

Result

After three weeks of trial, the jury rendered its verdict (11 to 1) awarding the Defendant/Owner $39 million in just compensation for the taking of the Property by the County. With mandatory interest and costs, the total awarded was over $40 million. In post-trial motion practice, Judge Murphy denied the Owner's Motion to Recover Litigation Expenses (totaling almost an additional $5 million in expenses and attorney's fees), finding that the County's final statutory offer was reasonable in light of the evidence presented at trial.

Other Information

The court's decision on the fee motion is now on appeal on the grounds that the Court made critical errors by improperly failing to consider the County's true or net offer of compensation. The County's offer included interest, cost, and fees, which should have been deducted from the gross offer to arrive at a net offer of compensation.

Deliberation

1 day

Poll

11 to 1

Length

15 days


#140424

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390