This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Intentional Misrepresentation

Matua Kisini v. Valassis Communications Inc., Valassis Sales & Marketing Services Inc., Harland Clarke Holdings, Deborah Dwight, Desiree Eisaman, Frank Patano, and Does 1-100

Published: Apr. 7, 2023 | Result Date: Sep. 26, 2022 | Filing Date: May 3, 2019 |

Case number: 19STCV15507 Settlement –  $775,000

Judge

Maren E. Nelson

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David A. Tashroudian
(Tashroudian Law Group APC)

Mona Tashroudian
(Tashroudian Law Group APC)

Nancy L. Abrolat
(Abrolat Law PC)


Defendant

Glenn L. Briggs
(Kading Briggs LLP)

Kymberleigh Damron-Hsiao
(Kading Briggs LLP)


Facts

From April 8, 2016 to November 2017, Matua Kisni worked for Valassis Communications, Valassis Sales & Marketing, Harland Clarke Holdings and Frank Patano. On November 9, 2018, Kisini filed suit in federal court against his former employers asserting claims for Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) violations , wrongful termination, false promise/intentional misrepresentation, and Labor Code violations. The case was thereafter remanded to Los Angeles Superior and Kisni sought to represent outside sales employees who worked for the companies during a certain time frame.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Generally, plaintiff contended that defendants discriminated against African-Americans with respect to the terms and conditions of employment and was thereafter terminated because of his race and because he served as a witness in a FEHA-related workplace investigation. Specifically as to defendant Patano, plaintiff alleged that Patano, who worked in human resources, made representations that he knew to be false when he first offered employment to plaintiff in order to induce him to accept the position. As to the representative claim, he alleged wage and hour violations, such as those pertaining to meal and rest breaks and others.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all contentions.

Result

The class claims were settled for a gross amount of $775,000.


#140535

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390