This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Dog Attack
Strict Liability

Michelle Carr v. Robert Stice

Published: Mar. 24, 2023 | Result Date: Nov. 7, 2022 | Filing Date: Oct. 4, 2021 |

Case number: 30-2021-01224296-CU-PO-CJC Settlement –  $650,000

Judge

Nancy E. Zeltzer

Court

Orange County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Sterling S. Winchell
(Law Offices of Sterling S. Winchell)


Defendant

Marcus S. Loo
( Stratman & Williams-Abrego)


Facts

Plaintiff Michelle Carr owns and operates a dog and cat grooming salon, handles all operations of the business in the front reception-room, lobby area, namely greeting and interacting with all customers when they bring in their pets, checking their pets in for grooming services. Defendant brought his Wheaton Terrier in for grooming. Defendant Robert Stice was a frequent customer. Defendant didn't sign his dog in that day, and instead informed Plaintiff that his dog had undergone recent surgery and asked whether it was safe or advisable to admit the dog for bath and grooming. Plaintiff asked where the surgery incisions were, and Defendant responded on back of one thy and another on the inner side of the back leg and asked Plaintiff to look them. When Plaintiff bent over to look at the incisions, the dog lunged at Plaintiff and bit her violently on the left ear, completely tearing off the eaves flap [the upper part of the ear]. Plaintiff then ran to the paper towel dispenser to get something to stop the bleeding. When she turned around, Defendant handed Michelle the top half of her left ear that was on the floor, and which otherwise could have been lost or eaten up by the dog. Plaintiff had her employees close the store, and Plaintiff immediately dashed out the door with her ear in a paper towel and sped in her car to Fountain Valley Regional Hospital emergency. Plaintiff underwent reconstructive surgery that same morning.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff claimed strict liability for a dog bite. Plaintiff contends the veterinarian rule, namely that someone who routinely works with dogs assumes the risk of dog bites, did not apply because it is inapplicable where commercial dog groomer had not yet formally accepted defendant's dog for grooming or entered into contractual grooming agreement.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defense asserted the veternarian defense rule.

Insurer

Farmers

Specials in Evidence

Meds: $273,713

Injuries

Disfigurement due to loss of upper half of left ear, four reconstructive surguries over a period of one year, and continual pain and inconvenience during the one year recovery.

Result

The case settled for $650,000.


#140669

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390