This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Periods

Sandra Medina, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Evolve Mortgage Services LLC

Published: May 19, 2023 | Result Date: Nov. 18, 2022 | Filing Date: Aug. 13, 2021 |

Case number: 8:21-cv-01338-CJC-JDE Settlement –  $575,000

Judge

Cormac J. Carney

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Matthew C. Helland
(Nichols Kaster LLP)

Daniel S. Brome
(Nichols Kaster LLP)


Defendant

Alejandro D. Szwarcsztejn
(Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart PC)


Facts

Evolve Mortgage Services LLC provides outsourced mortgage services and technologies. Sandra Medina was employed as a mortgage underwriter by Evolve from August 2020 until February 2021. On August 13, 2021, Medina filed suit against Evolve on behalf of herself and on behalf of all others who were employed by Evolve as non-exempt employees and former employees eligible for commission and other non-discretionary incentive pay.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that Evolve failed to pay overtime wages; failed to provide meal periods; failed to pay meal period premiums; failed to provide itemized wage statements; failed to pay wages timely upon separation from employment; violated the Unfair Competition Law; and was liable for civil penalties under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act. Specifically, Medina contended that Evolve failed to include non-discretionary incentive pay in its calculation of employees' regular rates for determining overtime rates. Moreover, Medina contended Evolve had engaged in this conduct knowingly, intentionally, and in bad faith.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied any wrongdoing or liability. Moreover, Evolve contended that the action could not proceed as a class action; and that there were discrepancies between some employees' time records and computer activity data.

Result

The parties reached an agreement wherein Evolve agreed to pay $575,000 to settle class members' and PAGA claims.


#140745

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390