This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Failure to Provide Adequate Oversight

Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund, Derivatively on behalf of Symantec Corporation v. Stephen M. Bennett, et al.

Published: Jun. 9, 2023 | Result Date: Jun. 13, 2022 | Filing Date: Apr. 16, 2013 |

Case number: 1-13-CV-244718 Settlement –  Non-monetary relief

Judge

Sunil R. Kulkarni

Court

Santa Clara County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Brian J. Robbins
(Robbins LLP)

Kevin A. Seely
(Robbins LLP)

Ashley R. Rifkin
(Robbins LLP)

Paul T. Warner
(The Warner Law Firm)

Maria Cangemi
(Robein, Urann, Spencer, Picard & Cangemi APLC)


Defendant

Katherine L. Henderson
(Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati PC)

William B. Chandler III
(Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati PC)


Facts

NortonLifeLock Inc. (Norton), formerly known as Symantec Corporation, is a global provider of security, storage, and systems management solutions that offer organizations and consumers with secure management for their digital information.

Relator Lori Morsell filed a qui tam complaint against Norton, contending that Norton breached its obligations under its U.S. General Services Administration Multiple Award Schedule Contract (GSA Schedule Contract) and violated the False Claims Act. Specifically, Morsell asserted the company provided false, incomplete, and inaccurate information to the U.S. government regarding the discounts that Norton offered to other customers, and ultimately overcharged the U.S. government for its products and services.

Subsequently, Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund brought a shareholder derivative action against Norton and certain of the company's officers and directors.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff asserted claims for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment, contending that Norton failed to provide adequate oversight as to its obligations under the GSA Schedule Contract.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all contentions.

Settlement Discussions

Over the course of several months, the parties engaged in good-faith negotiations regarding a potential resolution of the derivative action, which included participating in a number of telephonic conferences and exchanging multiple drafts of the settlement demand. The parties' negotiations ultimately culminated in the settlement agreement.

Result

The company agreed to implement and maintain reforms related to its Chief Compliance Officer, Audit Committee Charter, Government Contracts, and Management Disclosure Committee.


#140892

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390