This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Periods

Destinee Hart, an individual, on behalf of herself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated v. Alika LLC dba Carlton Oaks Golf Club, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Published: Jul. 7, 2023 | Result Date: Jan. 6, 2023 | Filing Date: Jun. 11, 2021 |

Case number: 37-2021-00025651-CU-OE-CTL Settlement –  $310,106

Judge

Joel R. Wohlfeil

Court

San Diego County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Alexander I. Dychter
(Dychter Law Offices APC)


Defendant

Terence L. Greene
(Delmore Greene LLP)

Ross M. Poole
(Delmore Greene LLP)


Facts

On June 11, 2021, Destinee Hart, individually and on behalf of the class, brought a class action against ALIKA LLC dba Carlton Oaks Golf Club, alleging various Labor Code violations. The class included all current and former non-exempt hourly employees working for ALIKA LLC in California at any time from June 11, 2017, through August 31, 2022. On August 30, 2022, the parties participated in a mediation session before the well-respected and experienced wage and hour class action mediator Barry M. Winograd, Esquire.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff alleged that defendants failed to: pay all straight-time and overtime wages for all work performed, provide compliant duty-free meal breaks or pay premiums at the regular rate of compensation, provide compliant duty-free rest periods or pay premiums at the regular rate of compensation, reimburse all incurred business expenses, provide accurate itemized wage statements, and pay all wages upon separation of employment for its California employees during the relevant time period. Moreover, plaintiff contended that defendants violated the Business and Professions Code based on the aforementioned violations.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all contentions.

Result

Defendant agreed to pay $310,106 to settle all claims.


#140995

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390