This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Violation of Proposition 65

APS&EE LLC v. ABB Installation Products Inc., Do It Best Corp., and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

Published: Jul. 21, 2023 | Result Date: Mar. 6, 2023 | Filing Date: Sep. 20, 2022 |

Case number: 22STCV30703 Settlement –  $39,500

Judge

Douglas W. Stern

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Lucas T. Novak
(Law Offices of Lucas T. Novak)


Defendant

Jennifer Michelle H. King
(Hartman King PC)


Facts

ABB Installation Products, Inc. and Do It Best Corp. manufacture, distribute, or sell heavy duty ground clamps and conduits throughout California. APS&EE, LLC is a California organization that, on October 1, 2021, sent a notice of alleged violation of Proposition 65 to ABB, Do It Best, and various public enforcement agencies. After no enforcement action was forthcoming, APS&EE filed suit against ABB and Do It Best on March 6, 2023.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: The plaintiffs contended that the defendants manufactured, sold, or distributed heavy duty ground clamps and T&B brand conduits throughout California; that the clamps and conduits contained lead; that handling the clamps and conduit could expose California consumers to unsafe levels of lead; that lead is a substance known to the State to cause cancer and reproductive harm; that the defendants were required to provide a clear warning to consumers regarding lead exposure associated with their products; that the defendants failed to provide the required warnings; that this failure exposed, or could expose, unknowing consumers to lead; and that the defendants were liable for their failure to warn consumers in violation of Proposition 65.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: The defendants denied any wrongdoing or liability.

Result

The parties entered a consent judgment wherein the defendants admitted no wrongdoing but agreed to reformulate offending products or provide a clear warning to consumers, and the defendants also agreed to pay $39,500 to settle the plaintiff's claims.


#141151

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390