Andrew Maria v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura
Published: Aug. 11, 2023 | Result Date: Mar. 29, 2023 | Filing Date: Jul. 8, 2022 |Case number: 2:22-cv-05582-MCS (GJS) Bench Decision – Defense
Judge
Court
CD CA
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Christine A. Renshaw
(Office of the Ventura County Counsel)
Facts
On August 8, 2022, Andrew Maria filed, pro se, a civil rights complaint against the County of Ventura's Board of Supervisors. In essence, Maria believed that the November 2020 elections were unfair because the voting machines used contained a computer backdoor security risk that would allow computer-savvy individuals to alter vote totals without detection. Accordingly, he asserted three civil rights claims.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that, given that he exposed this possibility, it was now up to defendant to prove that its voting system and procedures were fairly conducted. Specifically, he argued that by using voting machines with these security risks, defendant deprived its citizens of knowing if their votes were accurately counted, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause and due process rights. Moreover, the situation also violated the U.S. Constitution's Guarantee Clause because voters of the tainted elections could not guarantee the republican form of government.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant argued, primarily, that dismissal was warranted because plaintiff lacked standing to pursue his claims, because he failed to satisfy the injury-in-fact element of the standing requirement.
Result
The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390