This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Assault and Battery
Intententional Interference with Civil Rights

Lyn Rawles v. City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Sheriff's Department, and Does 1-4

Published: Sep. 15, 2023 | Result Date: May 9, 2023 | Filing Date: Dec. 4, 2020 |

Case number: CGC-20-588157 Settlement –  $200,000

Judge

Samuel K. Feng

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Felicia M. Medina
(Medina Orthwein LLP)


Defendant

Raymond R. Rollan
(Office of the San Francisco City Attorney)

Renee E. Rosenblit
(Office of the San Francisco City Attorney)


Facts

On December 4, 2020, Lyn Rawles, who is a Black, disabled, transgender woman, filed suit against the City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco Sheriff's Department.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: The plaintiff contended that on November 5, 2019, she attempted to vote at San Francisco City Hall but was denied; that she attempted to file a grievance the next day, but she was assaulted and wrongfully arrested by two sheriff's deputies; that she was held in custody at the county jail at 425 Seventh Street in San Francisco in a booking cell with no bed for days; that the San Francisco Sheriff's Department refuses to house transgender women according to their gender identity; that, as a result of this policy, the plaintiff contended her options were to be housed with men or in solitary confinement; that she was jailed for three days without being charged with a crime; and that she was sexually assaulted and harassed by Department employees under the guise of performing searches. The plaintiff contended she was entitled to recover for battery; assault; sexual battery; intentional interference with her civil rights via unreasonable search and seizure; false arrest and imprisonment; intrusion into private affairs; negligence; and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: The defendant denied any wrongdoing or liability and all the plaintiff's material allegations.

Result

The parties reached an agreement wherein the defendant admitted no wrongdoing or liability but agreed to pay $200,000 to settle the plaintiff's claims.


#141429

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390