This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Periods

Patricia Benton, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and aggrieved v. Northern California Inalliance; Andrea Croom, and Does 1 to 100, inclusive

Published: Oct. 20, 2023 | Result Date: May 12, 2023 | Filing Date: Jan. 25, 2021 |

Case number: 34-2021-00293036 Settlement –  $650,000

Judge

Lauri A. Damrell

Court

Sacramento County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Zachary M. Crosner
(Crosner Legal PC)

Jamie K. Serb
(Crosner Legal PC)


Defendant

S. Edward Slabach
(Young, Minney & Corr LLP)


Facts

On January 25, 2021, Patricia Benton, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and aggrieved, brought a class action against Northern California InAlliance and Andrea Croom, alleging various Labor Code violations. The class included all persons employed by Northern California InAlliance in California and classified as non-exempt employees who worked for Northern California InAlliance from January 16, 2020, through December 20, 2022. Defendants estimated there were 234 Class Members who collectively worked a total of 32,419 Workweeks and 234 of Aggrieved Employees who worked a total of 14,962 of Private Attorney General Act Pay Periods.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff alleged that defendants failed to: pay minimum wages, pay overtime wages, provide meal periods, provide rest periods, pay sick time benefits, provide accurate wage statements, maintain accurate records, and reimburse business expenses for its non-exempt California employees during the relevant time period. Further, plaintiff contended that defendants engaged in unfair competition.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all contentions.

Settlement Discussions

On September 21, 2022, the parties participated in an all-day mediation presided over by Michael Loeb, Esq., which led to a settlement agreement.

Result

Defendants agreed to pay $650,000 to resolve all claims.


#141677

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390