This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Disability Discrimination

Chris Langer v. Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. et al

Published: Oct. 27, 2023 | Result Date: Jul. 18, 2023 | Filing Date: Nov. 5, 2020 |

Case number: 2:20-cv-10165-JAK-SK Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

John A. Kronstadt

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Russell C. Handy
(Center for Disability Access)

Raymond G. Ballister Jr.
(Center for Disability Access)

Zachary M. Best
(Center for Disability Access)

Isabel Rose O. Masanque
(Center for Disability Access)


Defendant

Gregory F. Hurley
(Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP)

Stacy M. Dominguez
(Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP)


Facts

On September 28, 2020, Chris Langer filed suit against Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: The plaintiff contended that he had delayed endolymphatic hydrops, which caused him permanent, partial hearing loss; that he relied on subtitles and closed captioning to be able to review the content of recorded audio; that the defendant owns and operates membership campgrounds and RV parks in California. The plaintiff contended the campgrounds and parks operated by the defendant were places of public accommodation; that he visited the defendant's website to look for information about camping grounds and other facilities operated by the defendant; that the video content on the website lacked captioning; and that he encountered difficulty when trying to view the videos. The plaintiff contended that he was deterred from returning to the website because of this; and that the defendant had violated the Americans with Disabilities Act.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: The defendant denied any wrongdoing or liability. The defendant contended that, after the complaint was filed, it ensured all its videos on the website were updated to include captions; and that it had not received any other complaints about the lack of captioning.

Result

The court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant.


#141753

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390