Andrew Zubia, Dana Marie Ganal, Christian Hernandez, and Michael Woods, individually, on a representative basis, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Procter & Gamble Company, Procter & Gamble Distributing LLC, and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Published: Nov. 3, 2023 | Result Date: May 26, 2023 | Filing Date: Nov. 18, 2020 |Case number: 20STCV44506 Settlement – $3,750,000
Judge
Court
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Brian J. Mankin
(Lauby, Mankin & Lauby LLP)
Misty M. Lauby
(Lauby, Mankin & Lauby LLP)
Kane Moon
(Moon Law Group PC)
Allen V. Feghali
(Moon Law Group PC)
Edwin M. Kamarzarian
(Moon & Yang APC)
Joseph Lavi
(Lavi & Ebrahimian LLP)
Vincent C. Granberry
(Lavi & Ebrahimian LLP)
Carolyn H. Cottrell
(Schneider, Wallace, Cottrell & Konecky LLP)
Ori Edelstein
(Schneider, Wallace, Cottrell & Konecky LLP)
Andrew D. Weaver
(Schneider, Wallace, Cottrell & Konecky LLP)
Defendant
James P. Carter
(Jackson Lewis PC)
Jina Lee
(Jackson Lewis PC)
Facts
On November 18, 2020, Andrew Zubia filed a class and representative action against his former employer, Procter & Gamble Company in Los Angeles Superior. The following year, on May 5, Dana Ganal filed a class action in Riverside Superior also against Procter & Gamble. Later, several other actions--Christian Hernandez in Riverside Superior and Michael Woods in Sacramento Superior--were later consolidated.
Contentions
PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff asserted several wage-and-hour claims against defendant, including: failure to pay minimum, regular and/or overtime wages; failure to provide or pay premiums for meal and/or rest periods; failure to reimburse business expenses; failure to provide complete and accurate wage statements; failure to pay wages on termination; failure to maintain temperature providing reasonable comfort; failure to pay wages weekly; and violations of California Business and Professions codes. Plaintiffs also sought penalties for those violations under PAGA.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the allegations, any failure to comply with the laws, and any and all liability for the contended causes of action.
Settlement Discussions
On March 30, 2022, the parties participated in an all-day mediation presided over by retired judge Carl West. Discussions and negotiation continued thereafter until around November 18, 2022, when an agreement was entered into.
Result
Defendant agreed to pay $3.75 million as the gross settlement amount.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390