This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Periods

Kyana Rampley, individually and on behalf of all employees similarly situated, v. Bear Valley Community Healthcare District, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: Nov. 17, 2023 | Result Date: Jun. 1, 2023 | Filing Date: Jul. 29, 2021 |

Case number: 5:21-cv-01270-SPG-SHK Settlement –  $240,000

Judge

Sherilyn P. Garnett

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kevin Mahoney
(Mahoney Law Group APC)

John A. Young
(Mahoney Law Group APC)


Defendant

Sawyer C. Stephens
(Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP)


Facts

Kyana Rampley was employed as a phlebotomist in a non-exempt hourly position by Bear Valley Community Healthcare District. From October 2017 through March 2021, Rampley worked at Bear Valley Community Hospital in Big Bear Lake. On July 29, 2021, Rampley filed suit on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated against the Healthcare District.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: The plaintiff contended that the defendant routinely had employees work more than 40 hours per work week; that she was paid on an hourly basis and received non-discretionary bonuses; that the defendant did not include the non-discretionary bonuses and shift differentials when calculating regular rates of pay for the purposes of calculating overtime compensation; that the defendant's failure resulted in the underpayment of overtime wages; that the defendant failed to properly compensate her for time spent on-call under the defendant's control; that the defendant failed to pay for all hours worked; and that the defendant did so willfully. The plaintiff contended that these failures made the defendant liable for damages and for civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: The defendant denied any wrongdoing or liability and all the plaintiff's material allegations.

Settlement Discussions

On December 2, 2022, the parties participated in a full-day mediation session that resulted in the principal terms of their settlement agreement.

Result

The parties reached an agreement wherein the defendant admitted no liability or wrongdoing but agreed to pay $240,000 to settle class and PAGA claims.


#141882

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390