Bryan Hicks, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated v. California Water Service, and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Published: Dec. 1, 2023 | Result Date: Aug. 11, 2023 | Filing Date: Feb. 23, 2021 |Case number: 21CV376394 Settlement – $2,150,000
Judge
Court
Santa Clara County Superior Court
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Edwin Aiwazian
(Lawyers for Justice PC)
Defendant
Catherine A. Conway
(Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP)
Cynthia C. McTernan
(Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP)
Jacob U. Arber
(Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP)
Facts
Bryan Hicks, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, brought a putative class and Private Attorney General Act action against California Water Service, alleging various Labor Code violations. The class included all current and former hourly non-exempt California Water Service employees who worked for California Water Service in California from February 23, 2017, through August 8, 2022. California Water Service estimated that there were approximately 1,040 class members.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant failed to: pay all wages timely during employment and upon separation of employment, pay minimum and overtime wages, pay rest break premiums at the regular rate of pay, provide complete and accurate wage statements, maintain accurate and complete payroll records showing hours worked daily, and reimburse and indemnify employees for losses and expenditures for its California employees during the relevant time period.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all contentions.
Settlement Discussions
On February 23, 2022, the parties participated in an all-day virtual mediation session with experienced professional mediator, Jeffrey Krivis, Esq.
Result
California Water Service agreed to pay $2,150,000 to settle the case.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390