This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Federal Torts Claim Act

James and Elizabeth Console Family v. United States

Published: Apr. 26, 2024 | Result Date: Sep. 18, 2023 | Filing Date: Apr. 11, 2023 |

Case number: 3:23-cv-00652-DMS-JLB Bench Decision –  Defendant

Judge

Dana M. Sabraw

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Pro Per


Defendant

Juliet M. Keene
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

After trying for several years to recover money they lost from their retirement accounts with Total Wealth Management, James and Elizabeth Console sued the United States, alleging that various government employees wrongfully delayed or declined to bring criminal charges against the individuals who had perpetrated a Ponzi-like scheme, targeting seniors and defrauding them of their retirement accounts. According to plaintiffs, these individuals had been involved in previous federal criminal cases, including a Securities Exchange Commission civil lawsuit in 2015, and the government knew of their Ponzi-type of schemes, yet still failed to bring criminal charges against them. After receiving no response from the government as to their complaints, they sued the United States in USDC Southern, arguing in part, that several laws including the Crime Crime Victims' Rights Act, Victims' Rights and Restitution Act and Principles of Federal Prosecution obligated the government to pursue actions against the defrauders.

Result

The court granted the United States motion to dismiss, reasoning that plaintiffs' claims derived from the government's exercise of prosecutorial discretion and thus were barred under the discretionary function exception and dismissed the case with prejudice.


#142106

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390