In re: McKinsey & Co. Inc. National Prescription Opiate Consultant Litigation
Published: May 3, 2024 | Result Date: Feb. 2, 2024 |Case number: 3:21-md-02996-CRB Settlement – $207,000,000
Judge
Court
USDC Northern District of California
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Elizabeth J. Cabraser
(Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein LLP)
Aelish M. Baig
(Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP)
Taeva C. Shefler
(Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP)
Hadiya K. Deshmukh
(Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP)
Defendant
James L. Bernard
(Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP)
Josh A. Cohen
(Debevoise & Plimpton LLP)
Mark David McPherson
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)
Ingrid S. Martin
(Todd & Weld LLP)
Facts
McKinsey & Company is a worldwide consulting firm. One of its clients, Purdue Pharma, it the maker of Oxycontin. McKinsey helped Purdue devise marketing strategies for its products.
A group of private citizens, city governments, Native American tribes, school districts, and others filed suit against McKinsey in the Northern District of California.
Contentions
PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that McKinsey played a seminal role in helping Purdue carry out a targeted marketing campaign to increase sales; that these campaigns deceptively downplayed the dangers of addiction associated with Oxycontin; and that these deceptive campaigns led to the over-prescribing of opioids, resulting in the national opioid epidemic. The plaintiffs contended that McKinsey had acted fraudulently; had been negligent; had created a public nuisance; and had violated numerous state consumer protection laws.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: McKinsey denied any wrongdoing or liability and all the plaintiffs' material allegations and claims. Moreover, McKinsey contended that it had never manufactured, distributed, or sold prescription medicine; and that it had never interacted with or made any representations to any of the plaintiffs.
Settlement Discussions
In August 2022, the parties participated in a two-day in person mediation session with Jed D. Melnick, Esq. and Simone Lelchuk of JAMS. They continued remote mediation with Melnick through early 2023, resulting in a settlement agreement.
Result
McKinsey and the government-unit plaintiffs reached an agreement wherein McKinsey admitted no liability or wrongdoing but agreed to pay $207 million to settle their claims. This was in addition to an approximately $641.5 million settlement agreement reached with other plaintiffs.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390