This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Right to Privacy
California Confidentiality Of Medical Information Act

Michael Wilson, a person lacking legal capacity by Mosanthony Wilson, his conservator, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Maxim Healthcare Services Inc.

Published: Jan. 26, 2024 | Result Date: Jul. 28, 2023 | Filing Date: Nov. 16, 2022 |

Case number: 37-2022-00046497-CU-MC-CTL Settlement –  Reimbursement

Judge

Keri G. Katz

Court

San Diego County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

M. Anderson Berry
(Arnold Law Firm)

Gregory Haroutunian
(Clayeo C. Arnold APLC)

John J. Nelson
(Milberg, Coleman, Bryson, Phillips & Grossman)


Defendant

Matthew D. Pearson
(Baker & Hostetler LLP)


Facts

Maxim Healthcare Services provides skilled nursing, physical rehabilitation, along with companion, respite and behavioral care for those with disabilities and illnesses. From October 1, 2020 to December 4, 2020, Maxim experienced a data incident, notifying affected individuals the following year, on or about November 4, 2021. On December 20, 2022, Michael Wilson, through his conservator Mosanthony Wilson, filed a class action suit in San Diego Superior against Maxim for violations of the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act and negligence.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant failed to take reasonable precautionary measures to protect the confidential medical and sensitive personal information it collects and maintains from unauthorized and unlawful access, use or disclosure especially given that defendant waited until the following year to notify the data breach victims. The information obtained were all personal identifying information including names, addresses, dates of birth, contact information, medical history, medical condition or treatment information, medical record number, diagnosis code, patient account number, Medicare/Medicaid number, username/password, and Social Security numbers.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all plaintiff's claims, asserting it engaged in no wrongdoing.

Result

The case settled. As part of the settlement, class members would be provided free identity-theft protection for 12 months, and would be eligible to receive up to $5,000 for expense reimbursement caused by the data incident.


#142244

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390