This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Periods

Angelica Aguilar, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated v. Distribution Alternatives Inc., and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: Nov. 24, 2023 | Result Date: Sep. 7, 2023 | Filing Date: Mar. 29, 2022 |

Case number: CIVSB2206760 Settlement –  $700,000

Judge

Joseph T. Ortiz

Court

San Bernardino County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Bevin A. Pike
(Capstone Law APC)

Daniel S. Jonathan
(Capstone Law APC)

Trisha K. Monesi
(Capstone Law APC)


Defendant

Leila Nourani
(Jackson Lewis PC)

Martin P. Vigodnier
(Jackson Lewis PC)


Facts

On March 29, 2022, Angelica Aguilar, individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, brought a putative wage-and-hour class action against Distribution Alternatives Inc., alleging various Labor Code violations. On July 20, 2022, Aguilar filed the operative First Amended Complaint alleging an additional cause of action for civil penalties under the Private Attorney General Act. Pursuant to the Parties' settlement agreement, the class included all hourly, non-exempt employees who are currently or have been directly employed by defendant in California from March 29, 2018, through September 10, 2023.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff alleged that defendant failed to: pay overtime and minimum wages, provide meal periods, permit rest breaks, provide non-compliant wage statements, maintain payroll records, timely pay wages upon termination, timely pay wages during employment, and reimburse for necessary business expenses for its California employees during the relevant time period. Further, plaintiff contended that defendant engaged in unfair and unlawful business practices.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant has denied, and continues to deny any liability whatsoever, denies the factual and legal allegations in the case and contends that it has valid defenses to plaintiff's claims. By agreeing to settle, defendant is not admitting liability on any of the factual allegations or claims in the case or that the case can or should proceed as a class action. Defendant has agreed to settle the case as part of a negotiated compromise with plaintiff of highly contested factual and legal issues.

Settlement Discussions

On April 17, 2023, the parties participated in a full-day mediation before Michael Young, Esq., a well-regarded mediator experienced in mediating complex labor and employment matters.

Result

Distribution Alternatives Inc. agreed to pay $700,000 to settle the case.


#142250

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390