This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Periods

Beatriz Aldapa, et al. v. Fowler Packing Company Inc.

Published: Jan. 26, 2024 | Result Date: Jun. 6, 2023 | Filing Date: Mar. 17, 2015 |

Case number: 1:15-cv-00420-ADA-SAB Settlement –  $7,875,000

Judge

Ana I. De Alba

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Edgar I. Aguilasocho
(Martinez Aguilasocho Law Inc.)

Mario G. Martinez
(Martinez Aguilasocho Law Inc.)

Erica Deutsch
(Bush Gottlieb ALC)

Dexter F. Rappleye
(Bush Gottlieb)


Defendant

Christopher D. Dusseault
(Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP)

Tiffany X. Phan
(Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP)

Howard A. Sagaser
(Sagaser, Watkins & Wieland PC)

Charles P. Hamamjian
(Sagaser, Watkins & Wieland PC)


Facts

Plaintiffs are a group of approximately 20,500 seasonal agricultural workers. Meanwhile, defendant Fowler Packing was a commercial grower, packer, and shipper of various fruits, while defendant Ag Force is a farm labor contractor. Defendant Fowler Marketing International was responsible for marketing and selling the crops that Fowler Packing owns and that Ag Force employees harvest. On October 20, 2016, plaintiffs brought a wage and hour class action against Fowler Packing, Fowler Marketing International, and Ag Force, alleging a variety of state and federal labor law violations. The class included all individuals who were employed by defendants as a non-exempt "field worker" or agricultural worker from March 17, 2011, to January 1, 2019.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs alleged that defendants failed to: pay all wages due or provide necessary tools, compensate for rest breaks, pay all wages due under the employment contract by requiring off-the-clock work and allowing the use of "ghost workers," pay overtime wages, pay minimum wages, provide necessary tools or reimburse for tools, retain the benefits of labor without reasonable compensation, keep accurate records or provide accurate wage statements, record and pay for travel time and wait time, reimburse for vehicle expenses, and provide meal periods and keep accurate records of meal periods for its agricultural workers.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all contentions.

Result

Defendants agreed to pay $7,875,000 to settle the case.


#142285

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390