This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
This MCLE has expired.

Civil Rights
Malicious Prosecution
False Arrest

Octavio Suarez v. Detective Josue Torres, Sergeant Jose Rojas, and Does 1 Through 100, Inclusive

Published: Dec. 1, 2023 | Result Date: Aug. 24, 2023 | Filing Date: Aug. 23, 2021 |

Case number: 21STCV31040 Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Daniel S. Murphy

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Perfisity McGhee
(Law Office of Perfisity McGhee)


Defendant

Paul B. Beach
(Lawrence, Beach, Allen & Choi PC)


Facts

Plaintiff Octavio Suarez was arrested and charged with the murder of Miguel Herrera. During the investigation, plaintiff alleged he was misidentified by a witness to the incident. The information against plaintiff was eventually dismissed, and he filed an action for malicious prosecution against defendants County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Detective Josue Torres, and Sergeant Jose Rojas. Plaintiff later amended to assert false arrest.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff claimed that plaintiff's arrest was unlawful because it lacked probable cause.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendants claimed that the arrest was proper because there was probable cause for plaintiff's arrest; plaintiff was collaterally estopped from arguing lack of probable cause because the magistrate found sufficient cause to hold him over during the preliminary hearing. Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.

Result

Motion for summary judgment granted for defendants as to each of plaintiff's claims. The court found that there was probable cause for plaintiff's arrest, regardless of whether plaintiff actually committed the crime, because he was similar to the description of the suspect provided by the witness and was identified by the same witness from a six-pack photographic lineup, both of which provided probable cause. The court also held there was collateral estoppel on the issue of probable cause because the magistrate at the preliminary hearing found sufficient cause to hold plaintiff over for trial. The court further found that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity.


#142298

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390