This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Lease
Solar Roofs Contracts

Matthew Amans and Babak Malek, individually, and on behalf of all similarly situated v. Tesla Inc.

Published: Feb. 23, 2024 | Result Date: Oct. 20, 2023 | Filing Date: May 12, 2021 |

Case number: 3:21-cv-03577-VC Settlement –  $6,080,000

Judge

Vince G. Chhabria

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Eve-Lynn Rapp
(Edelson PC)

Justin T. Berger
(Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP)

Sarvenaz J. Fahimi
(Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP)

Peter A. Muhic
(The Miller Law Firm PC)


Defendant

David C. Marcus
(Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale & Dorr LLP)

Allison Bingxue Que
(Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale & Dorr LLP)

Alan E. Schoenfeld
(Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale & Dorr LLP)

Ryan M. Chabot
(Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale & Dorr LLP)


Facts

Matthew Amans and Babak Malek entered into contracts with Telsa Inc. (Tesla) for the installation of a Solar Roof in April 2021. Tesla increased the prices to be charged to existing consumers for the Solar Roofs. On May 12, 2021, Amans, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, brought a putative class action against Tesla. The class included all persons with whom Telssa entered into a contract for the purchase and/or installation of a Solar Roof with or without a Powerwall energy storage system in the United States and whom Telsa notified, in or around April 2021, would be required to pay an increased price as a condition for performance of the contract. On May 17, 2021, and July 20, 2021, Sol Kim, Aaron Mandell, Alissa Beth, Cohen Mandell, Mattias Astrom, Arpan Patel, Anupama Vivek, Jerin Zacariah, Peter Burns, and Babak Malek filed separate complaints related to the same conduct. On February 22, 202, Amans and Babek filed their amended complaint, asserting breach of contract, violation of California's Unfair Competition Law, California Business & Professions Code, California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and the Truth In Lending Act.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that defendant increasing the price of the Solar Roofs was a breach of contract and violated several other federal and state consumer protection laws. Plaintiffs sought to have defendant honor consumers' contracts at the original price and compensate them for losses related to preparations for the installation of a contracted-for Solar Roof.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all contentions.

Settlement Discussions

On January 14, 2022, the parties attended a full-day scheduled videoconference mediation session with Robert A. Meyer, Esq. of JAMS.

Result

The parties reached an agreement wherein Tesla admitted no wrongdoing or liability but agreed to pay $6.08 million to settle class members' claims.


#142568

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390