This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Periods

Anthony Morris, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Lincoln National Corporation, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: Apr. 5, 2024 | Result Date: Nov. 1, 2023 | Filing Date: Jun. 22, 2022 |

Case number: 22STCV20426 Settlement –  $500,000

Judge

Lawrence P. Riff

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Isam C. Khoury
(Cohelan, Khoury & Singer)

Michael D. Singer
(Cohelan, Khoury & Singer)

Marta Manus
(Cohelan, Khoury & Singer)

Rosemary C. Khoury
(Cohelan, Khoury & Singer)

Sahag Majarian II
(Majarian Law Group APC)

Garen Majarian
(Majarian Law Group APC)


Defendant

Jesse C. Ferrantella
(Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart PC)

Cameron O. Flynn
(Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart PC)


Facts

On June 22, 2022, former employee Anthony Morris, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, brought a class action against The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Lincoln National Corporation, alleging various Labor Code violations. There were two classes. "Class I" meant all persons employed by Defendants (exempt and nonexempt) in California who worked from home pursuant to Defendants' alleged policy or practice requiring them to do so from June 22, 2018, to May 17, 2023. "Class II" meant all persons employed by Defendants in California as non-exempt employees from June 22, 2018, to May 17, 2023. Based on a review of its records to date, defendants estimated there are approximately 231 Class Members who collectively worked a total of approximately 27,662 Workweeks through January 23, 2023, and approximately 179 Aggrieved Employees who worked a total of approximately 5,124 Private Attorney General Act Period Pay Periods through January 23, 2023.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff alleged that defendants failed to: reimburse business expenses, pay all wages, pay overtime wages, provide compliant meal periods, provide compliant rest periods, provide accurate itemized wage statements, provide sick pay, and timely pay all wages during employment and upon separation of employment for its nonexempt California employees during the class period.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all contentions.

Settlement Discussions

On February 16, 2023, the parties participated in a day mediation presided over by Lou Marlin, Esq.

Result

Defendants agreed to pay $500,000 to settle the case.


#142669

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390