This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Copyright Infringement
Digital Millenium Copyright Act

Michael Grecco Productions Inc. v. ImageSelect B.V.

Published: Jul. 19, 2024 | Result Date: Mar. 11, 2024 | Filing Date: Oct. 11, 2022 |

Case number: 2:22-cv-07398-JAK-JPR Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Judge

John A. Kronstadt

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Barbara A. Jones
(Duane Morris LLP)

Gina M. Foran
(Duane Morris LLP)


Defendant

Nancy E. Wolff
(Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard LLP)


Facts

On October 11, 2022, Michael Grecco Productions sued ImageSelect B.V. for copyright infringement and violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Defendant is an online company organized in, and whose principal place of business is in the Netherlands.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: According to plaintiff, in 2012, it entered Contributor Agreements with RGB Ventures LLC d/b/a SuperStock. The agreements granted Superstock limited licenses to certain copyrighted material in plaintiff's portfolio. Pursuant to the agreements, SuperStock entered into a distributor agreement with defendant ImageSelect that would allow access to plaintiff's images on its website: http://www.imageselect.eu. Through this website, defendant allegedly reproduced, displayed, distributed and offered license rights to photographs and other content. In exchange, defendant would receive revenue from users paying to download images from its website.

In December 2013, the agreements were terminated though purportedly providing SuperStock continued licensing rights over plaintiff's images for an 18-month period. However, plaintiff contended that SuperStock continued to use and profit from plaintiff's work after the expiration of that 18-month period and plaintiff sued SuperStock in USDC Florida. According to plaintiff, judgment was entered in its favor and SuperStock and all its agents, including defendant, were prohibited from using plaintiff's copyrighted works thereafter.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant argued that plaintiff's complaint suffered from jurisdictional issues: no specific, personal jurisdiction over defendant. The complaint did not include allegations that defendant expressly aimed its website operations at California, and though district courts may exercise jurisdiction over foreign defendants, Calder v. Jones, required defendant's "tortious" actions be expressly aimed at the United States. As this required plaintiff to show more than operating a website accessible to the United States, plaintiff failed to establish this element.

Result

The court agreed with defendant and dismissed plaintiff's claims for lack of personal jurisdiction.


#143116

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390