This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Whistleblower Retaliation

Perry Davis v. Redlands Unified School District, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Published: May 24, 2024 | Result Date: Mar. 27, 2024 | Filing Date: Jan. 19, 2021 |

Case number: CIVSB2103756 Verdict –  $800,000

Judge

Jay H. Robinson

Court

San Bernardino County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Tamara S. Freeze
(Workplace Justice Advocates, PLC)

Brian G. Hannemann
(Hannemann Law Firm APC)


Defendant

Maria K. Aarvig
(Aarvig & Associates APC)


Facts

Plaintiff Perry Davis sued Redlands Unified School District after being terminated for reporting numerous illegal activity by school officials, such as circulating a nude photo of a student, and cover up and fraud at the school prom, where the assistant principal and the sheriff deputy allowed a student under the influence of THC to attend the prom. Plaintiff had a spotless record of excellent performance evaluations and pay raises for nine years prior to his sudden termination. After his complaints, RUSD placed him on administrative leave and trumped up nine false or exaggerated "charges" against him. Even though the district has a progressive discipline policy, RUSD ignored the requirement and went straight to termination. Plaintiff lost wages and suffered significant emotional distress.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff claimed whistleblower retaliation under Cal.Labor Code Sec 1102.5.

DEFENDAN'S CONTENTIONS: RUSD had legitimate reasons for plaintiff's termination.

Settlement Discussions

$7,000 offered by RUSD; prior to trial, Davis' last demand was $500,000.

Specials in Evidence

Loe: $250,000 Future Loe: $250,000

Injuries

Past and future wages ($500,000) and past and future emotional distress ($300,000)

Result

Plaintiff's verdict for $800,000.

Deliberation

three hours

Poll

12-0 (unanimous)

Length

13 days


#143129

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390