This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Environmental Contamination
Failure to Disclose

Fouad and Olga Nehme v. Conoco, Inc.

Published: Jun. 18, 1994 | Result Date: May 23, 1994 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 106220 –  $38,150

Judge

Melinda A. Johnson

Court

Ventura Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Laurence R. Clarke

Linda M. Libertucci


Defendant

Edward J. Casey
(Alston & Bird LLP)

Ward L. Benshoof


Experts

Plaintiff

Richard J. Zipp
(technical)

Stephen Shelton
(technical)

Defendant

Warren Rogers
(technical)

Timothy Durbin
(technical)

Facts

In 1987, Plaintiffs Fouad and Olga Nehme purchased a service station in Oxnard from Defendant George Gallo. At the time, the station was in the process of an environmental cleanup conducted by Defendant Kayo Oil Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Defendant Conoco, Inc. The cleanup, involving groundwater contamination, continues to this day.

Settlement Discussions

Defendant Conoco contends they made a 998 offer of $100,000 and Plaintiffs demanded "in excess of $7,000,000." Plaintiffs contend they made no specific demand.

Damages

According to Defendants, the damages claimed were as follows: $2,800,000 lost profits (later dismissed by Plaintiffs); $4,000,000 emotional distress; and clean-up costs. According to Plaintiffs, the damages claimed were as follows: Unspecified out-of-pocket expenses.

Injuries

Emotional distress.

Result

The jury found for the Defendants on the respective fraud counts; 11-1 the jury found for the Defendants on Plaintiffs' claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and for trespass caused by the contamination; 10-2 the jury found for Plaintiffs on their nuisance claim, awarding only $38,150; and the jury found for the Plaintiffs 12-0 on Defendant Kayo's Cross-complaint for damages from an alleged subsequent leak.

Deliberation

3 days

Poll

11-1, 10-2, 9-3

Length

8 weeks


#78058

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390