This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Breach of Contract
Construction
Extra Change Order

D.G. Mechanical Inc. v. Rainbow Disposal Company, et al.

Published: Oct. 22, 1994 | Result Date: Oct. 4, 1994 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: N60831 –  $81,545

Judge

Franklin J. Mitchell Jr.

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kenneth S. Grossbart
(Abdulaziz Grossbart & Rudman)


Defendant

Samuel Cubete


Experts

Plaintiff

Gary Schones
(technical)

Facts

In December of 1992, Plaintiff D.G. Mechanical and Defendant Rainbow Disposal Company entered into a construction contract which called for D.G. to install new utilities for 55 mobile home units in Escondido. The contract called for D.G. to perform trenching throughout the entire 55 units and then to trench 55 laterals in which new utilities would be installed. The contract between D.G. and Rainbow contained a "rock clause" which called for D.G. to receive extra money if conditions were met that were beyond normal trenching conditions. On the first day of trenching, Plaintiffs determined that the trenching conditions were not normal and that decomposed granite was below the surface of the mobile home park and caused the trenching conditions to go extremely slow. D.G. instituted the "rock clause" and proposed to Rainbow a method upon which extras would be charged. When Defendant stopped signing Plaintiff's extra change orders, the Plaintiff shut the job down until the situation was resolved. Plaintiff was never allowed to return to the job site and Defendant hired a replacement contractor to complete the work.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff contends that offers and demands were not exchanged prior to this verdict.

Damages

$64,000 in extras and contract damages. (Damages were calculated upon trenching of linear footage not dug. Footage not dug on any given day would be multiplied times a dollar figure of which the Plaintiff/Defendant attempted mutual agreement.)

Deliberation

3 hours

Poll

10-2

Length

6 days


#78259

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390