This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Breach of Contract
Fraud
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

James F. and Jeanne Meyer v. Coatings/Composites Inc., Albert J. Berger, Sauereisen Cements Company, Bertrand Dorfman, Phyllis Berger, et al.

Published: Nov. 5, 1994 | Result Date: Oct. 25, 1994 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC072676 –  $1,025,730

Judge

Florence-Marie Cooper

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Francis T. Donohue III
(Voss, Cook & Thel LLP)


Defendant

Larry K. Mandelker

Peter K. Rosen

Mark P. Lynch


Experts

Defendant

Maier N. Rosenberg
(technical)

Facts

On 1980, at the insistence of Plaintiff Jim Meyer's boss, Defendant Albert Berger, James and Jeanne Meyer took a mortgage out on their home to lend the money to Berger's company (Con/Chem) that was having a cash flow problem. The company made the monthly payments on the mortgage through 1987, when another crisis occurred that required Meyer to get a second mortgage to lend money to the company; making a total $80,000 that was lent to the company, which Con/Chem agreed in writing to repay. Also in 1987 Con/Chem transferred its assets to Coatings/Composites, a subsidiary corporation, in return for stock of Coatings and for Coatings' agreement to assume certain of Con/Chem's liabilities. Con/Chem was then placed in bankruptcy. For 5 years (from 1987 to 1992) Meyer was told that his loans to Con/Chem were among the debts assumed by Coatings and for over 5 years, Coatings made all payments on the loans, until November 1992. In December of 1992, Coatings sold its assets and then refused to pay the remaining balance on the loans.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiffs contend their demand was $150,000 (inclusive of costs and fees) one month prior to trial and $185,000 at the start of trial; and Defendants offered $150,000 while the jury was deliberating.

Damages

$73,772 general damages; $277,500 emotional distress; $674,000 punitive damages.

Result

The jury found that the Defendants had fraudulently transferred money out of Coatings with the intent to delay, hinder, and defraud creditors such as the Meyers; that Coatings breached an agreement to repay the loan; and that Defendant intentionally inflicted emotional distress on Plaintiffs.

Deliberation

3 days

Poll

12-0

Length

11 days


#78281

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390