This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

CONFIDENTIAL

Sep. 19, 1998

Construction
Negligent Construction
Condominium

Confidential

Settlement –  $1,100,000

Mediator

R. William Schoettler Jr.

Court

L.A. Superior Santa Monica


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael K. Wolder
(Wolder & Associates)


Defendant

Samuel H. Kraemer

Jerry C. Popovich
(Hawkins, Parnell & Young LLP)

Michael B. Lawler

Malcolm S. McNeil
(ArentFox Schiff LLP)

Gerald Unis

Donald D. Wilson


Experts

Plaintiff

William C. Sterling
(technical)

Marc C. Viau
(technical)

Ralph E. Phillips
(technical)

Facts

The plaintiffs were owners of a 5-unit luxury condominium complex located in Santa Monica. The plaintiffs claimed defective flashing/black paper connections at doors and windows, breaches in black paper allowing water to infiltrate stucco; sealed drip screed which had forced water into the home; defective door threshold conditions allowing water to seep in under the thresholds; failure to place back drains or similar drainage devices behind subterranean garage retaining walls allowing water to build up and penetrate through garage floors and walls; improper drainage from decks to outlets at the street; failure to install the roof and roof drains in water tight manner; and failure to properly waterproof the below grade walls of the homes and retaining walls. The plaintiffs further alleged electrical shortages in walls, telephone line problems within the walls; inadequate fall of the plumbing lines which caused the toilets and sinks to continually back up; improper plumbing connections to the toilets, tubs and showers which resulted in the line breakages and flooding, supposedly "high-end" carpets which are actually "seconds" and pieced together instead of full cuts; severe buckling of expensive hardwood flooring; and extensive mold and mildew in wall cavities and draperies. The plaintiffs brought this action against the defendant builder based on negligence, breach of warranty and strict liability theories. The plaintiffs also sued the realtor for non-disclosure of defects and litigation involving the same builder/developer and realtor on a similar project two blocks away.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a settlement demand for $1 million.

Damages

The plaintiffs claimed $1.8 million in damages.

Other Information

The settlement was reached approximately two years and three months after the case was filed. Defendant realtor settled with plaintiff prior to the mediation. A 3-day mediation was held before retired judge R. William Schoettler Jr., of JAMS resulting in the reported settlement. Per defendant, there were substantial insurance questions because of uninsured subcontractors and insolvent insurers. Ultimately, the matter was settled for the policy limit available to the developer and general contractor under the same policy.


#78796

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390