This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury (Non-Vehicular)
Product Liability
Defective Design

Malena White v. Soloflex, Inc.

Published: Dec. 21, 1996 | Result Date: Nov. 20, 1996 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: VC018402 –  $235,000

Court

L.A. Superior Norwalk


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Mark G. Weidmann

Kim F. Farrar


Defendant

Henry S. Zangwill


Experts

Plaintiff

Dr. Navatta
(medical)

Charles C. Cacha
(technical)

Dr. Zahlam
(medical)

Defendant

Mark Allen Gomez
(technical)

Eric Sternlicht
(technical)

Facts

On May 22, 1994, plaintiff Malena White, a 22-year-old administrative assistant, was performing squat exercises on her Soloflex Machine when she sustained injuries to her lower back. Defendant Soloflex, Inc. advertised the Soloflex Machine through infomercials, a video tape, and brochures. The plaintiff brought this action against Soloflex, Inc. based on product liability (defective design), false representation, negligent misrepresentation and breach of express and implied warranties.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a settlement demand for $400,000 (per the defendant) or $135,000 (per the plaintiff). The defendant made no settlement offer.

Specials in Evidence

$14,825 $2,800 (per the plaintiff) or $7,000 (per the defendant)

Injuries

The plaintiff alleged she sustained a herniated disk at L-5, 5-1, and was in traction for 71 days.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately one year and six months after the case was filed. ARBITRATION: An arbitration was held on Aug. 15, 1996 before Vincent Dalsimer resulting in a defense award. The plaintiff requested a trial de novo.

Deliberation

10 hours

Poll

12-0 (per the plaintiff); 9-3 (per the defendant, based on juror interviews)

Length

8 days


#79081

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390