This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Invasion of Privacy
Defamation

Megan Murphy v. Pinkerton Services Inc., San Mateo County General Hospital, James La Perle and Corey Hawk

Published: Feb. 8, 1997 | Result Date: Jan. 15, 1997 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 392034 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Allan J. Bollhoffer

Court

San Mateo Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Craig Harris Collins


Defendant

David A. Levy
(Office of the County Counsel)

Michael Pope


Facts

On March 3, 1994, plaintiff Megan Murphy, a 21-year-old woman, was a patient at defendant San Mateo County General Hospital. Defendant Corey Hawk, a 21-year-old employee of defendant Pinkerton Services Inc., worked as a security officer at the hospital. On Oct. 15, 1994, defendant Hawk obtained information from the plaintiff's medical records (from the hospital computer), and told the plaintiff's sister that she had an abortion. Defendant Hawk claimed that defendant James La Perle, a psychiatric nurse employed by the defendant hospital, unknowingly helped him gain access to the computer. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants based on invasion of privacy theories of recovery. Defendant Hawk defaulted.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a settlement demand for $20,000. The defendants made a settlement offer of $7,500.

Damages

The plaintiff sought $___________ in damages.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately two years and two months after the case was filed. ARBITRATION: An arbitration was held on Feb. 15, 1996 before Joseph Galligan resulting in a plaintiff;s award against Hawk and a defense award against the other defendants. The plaintiff requested a trial de novo. At trial, James La Perle categorically denied Hawk's contentions and the jury accepted his testimony as credible. A default has been entered against defendant Hawk, but it has not yet been perfected to judgment.

Deliberation

1½ hours

Poll

12-0

Length

7 days


#79210

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390